Child Safety Requires Timely Evidence
When a parent has a pending alcohol- or drug-related criminal charge, custody and parenting-time decisions shouldn’t be made on delay, guesswork, or outdated information. This proposal creates an automatic, expedited evidentiary hearing—so courts get prompt facts and can tailor child-safety measures fairly.
HF (TBD) / SF (TBD): automatic, court-initiated expedited evidentiary hearing (no motion required) when credible, court-verified records show a pending qualifying alcohol/drug-related charge. Keeps full judicial discretion; allows only temporary, narrowly tailored measures pending the hearing.
The Problem
Custody and parenting-time orders are continuing legal conditions that govern ongoing parent-child relationships. When a party has a pending alcohol- or drug-related criminal charge, courts may lack a timely evidentiary record to assess child safety and best interests.
- Decisions can rely on outdated information.
- Emergency or informal restrictions can occur without a prompt evidentiary hearing.
The goal is simple: timely facts, fair process, and individualized findings.
The Solution
The bill requires an automatic, court-initiated expedited evidentiary hearing—without requiring a motion—when reliable court records show a pending qualifying alcohol- or drug-related charge.
What the Bill Does
- Requires a timely evidentiary hearing when credible, court-verified notice is received.
- Preserves full judicial discretion over custody and parenting-time decisions.
- Allows only temporary, narrowly tailored child-safety measures pending the hearing.
- Requires written findings and least-restrictive conditions.
- Protects confidentiality of information gathered solely for family-court purposes.
This is designed to strengthen due process and child safety—without predetermining outcomes.
What the Bill Does Not Do
- Does not presume guilt.
- Does not mandate custody outcomes.
- Does not create a presumption of parental unfitness based solely on a charge.
- Does not reopen final judgments or settled cases.
Why It’s Constitutional
This approach is procedural and remedial—not punitive. It strengthens due process by guaranteeing notice, a prompt evidentiary hearing, the opportunity to present and challenge evidence, written findings supporting any restriction, and judicial discretion to tailor outcomes. Interim measures are temporary and expire without timely review.
FAQ
Does this presume guilt?
No. The process is civil and protective in nature. It triggers timely fact-finding when credible court records show a pending qualifying charge—without determining criminal guilt.
Does this force a custody outcome?
No. Judges retain full discretion. The purpose is to ensure courts have timely evidence and make individualized findings using existing standards.
What happens before the hearing?
Only temporary, narrowly tailored child-safety measures may be used pending the expedited evidentiary hearing, with written findings and least-restrictive conditions.
Does it reopen settled or final cases?
No. It does not reopen final judgments or settled cases; it applies prospectively to continuing custody/parenting-time orders.
Call to Action
Support HF (TBD) / SF (TBD). Child safety decisions deserve prompt facts, fair process, and judicial discretion.
One sentence to share
“Child safety decisions deserve prompt facts, fair process, and judicial discretion.”
Download the handout
Upload your PDF/DOCX to WordPress → Media → copy the file URLs → paste here.
Prepared and paid for by Accountability Begins at Home PAC, Minnesota. Contributions are not tax-deductible.
Join Accountability Begins at Home PAC
Fill this out and we’ll follow up. Prefer email? [email protected]
Paid for by Accountability Begins at Home PAC. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.